ANNALS OF IBADAN POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE
A.O. Sulaiman and G.E. Adebayo
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Background: Bulk purchase of Porcelain materials with some in less use and expiring before being exhausted has resulted in colossal economic loss in the past and present in our environment. Having knowledge of prevalent shade in this environment will minimize this loss.
Objectives: The study aimed at auditing the shade selection and identifying the most frequently selected shade for advanced restoration in the Conservative Dentistry Clinic as well as assessing the influence of gender and age on choice of shade selected.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of shade selection for advanced restorations fabricated over a period of seven years in the University College Hospital Dental Clinic spanning January 2009 to December 2016. Data collected which was analyzed using the SPSS Version 22, includes: Socio demographic data, oral hygiene status and social habits, designation of the doctors that took the shade, types of advanced restorations, tooth/teeth restored, shades selected and types of shade guides used if indicated.
Results: The outcome of the study showed that ‘A’ group shades were more chosen for advance restorations (50.6%). However, Vita shade A3 was the most selected of all the shades, while shade C4 was the least selected. Lighter shades of ‘A’ were more frequently selected in female patients (57%) while shade ‘D’ were chosen in the greater percentage of male patients (60%). Younger age groups less than 45years old tend to have lighter shade selected for their restorations. (Fig. 2).
Conclusion: Vita shade A3 (3M3) was the most frequently selected shade for aesthetic advanced restoration. Lighter shades are generally selected more in the female patients and younger age group.
Keywords: Shade selection, Shade guide, Advance restoration
Dr. G.E. Adebayo
Department of Restorative Dentistry,
University College Hospital,
The perception of colour and appearance of teeth is a complex phenomenon, with numerous factors such as lighting conditions, translucency, opacity, light scattering, gloss and the human eye and brain affecting the overall outcome of tooth colour.1,2Any slight change in shade from the natural may play with our eyes, our minds and our dentistry at large.3 Therefore, selecting the proper porcelain shade and colour match of ceramic restoration to natural dentition is still one of the most difficult and frustrating problems in fixed prosthodontics.4 However, progressive research on the visual system has helped us with better insight into how colour discrimination is influenced by environment, disease, drugs and aging.5
The fundamentals of colour and light, the radiation spectrum and the optical characteristics of the object is to be well understood prior to evaluating and selecting the correct colour shade for the restoration. To provide the patient with an aesthetically acceptable restoration, the scientific basis of colour as well as the artistic aspect must be considered. To describe colour in dentistry certain systems are used for clinical and research purposes which include The Munsell colour order system, the CIE L*a*b* (CIELAB), CIE L*c*h* colour Coordinate systems and the RGB (red, green and blue) system.6 The CIELAB system was developed in 1976 by the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) to produce a uniform colour space. The CIELAB system L* value measures lightness which correspond with the value (V) in the Munsell colour order system. The metric chroma [C*ab = (a2 + b2) 0.5] and hue angle (hab = tan-1 (b/a) can be derived from the a* and b* values as defined by CIE (1986). Metric chroma is represented as the radial distance of the colour coordinates (a*b*) for the L* axis. The hue angle (h°ab) is represented by the angle of the radial line joining the L* axis to the colour coordinates (a*, b*) measured from the a* axis.7
Clinical determination of tooth colour is possible by the use of a variety of methods such as visual assessment with shade guides, as well as instruments; spectrophotometers, colorimetric and computer based analysis of digital images.4,8 The first shade guide was introduced in 1956 by Vita Zahnfabrik. The most popular shade guides are VITA Classical, Chromascope, Vitapan 3D Master shade guide. VITA classical shade guide consist of 16 tabs, arranged into four groups based on the hue and within the group according to increasing Chroma. Hue is categorized by letter i.e., A = Orange, B = Yellow, C = Yellow/ Gray and D = Orange/Gray. Chroma and Value are categorized by numbers. Vita System 3D-Master comprises 26 samples ranging from lightest to darkest value, from lowest to highest intensity and from yellow to red. The tabs are grouped into 5 categories, numbered in sequence with increasing value (1-5). All tabs within the value group have the same brightness. The chroma increases from top to bottom in each of the groups. All the groups except 1 and 5 have 3 letters: L, M, R, which allows the hue to be chosen. L (light) is yellow, M (medium) is yellow-red, and R is a red hue. This shade is documented with a number/letter/ number system in which the first number indicates the value group (1-5), letter is the hue (L, M, R) and the chroma (1-3). E.g. 3M2 is the 3rd value group, M hue subgroup, and 2 chroma levels.3
Meanwhile, adequate knowledge of the distribution of shades chosen for definitive metal ceramic crowns in the past may be a useful auxiliary in shade selection especially for the inexperienced operators.3 Emphasis regarding ‘aesthetic standard’ on media has probably led to the most recent advances in shade matching.2 With more research and new technologies, there is possibility of achieving a greater percentage of successful match than what we have currently.2
Different range of shades exists for shade guide used in the dental Clinics and Dental Laboratories depending on the manufacturers of the shade guide. Distribution of the shade selected for advance restorations may differ from one clinic to the other which may be influenced by a number of factors such as the type of shade guide, experience of the operator, technique and light condition of the operatory.9 The results of some research indicate that the most frequently chosen shades in their clinics were in the mid-range of reddish-brown hue, but shades in the reddish-grey range of hue were rarely chosen.10 However, it has been shown that there was a statistically significant difference between the different individuals with respect to tooth shade selection ability.11 There may be need for blending of more than one shade in certain situations. Although, the selection of more than one shade for a crown (“mixed shades”) was generally restricted to the maxillary anterior teeth;10 perhaps being the most visible teeth in the aesthetic zone of the mouth.
Factors such as gender and visual abnormality of operator may affect the selection of shade for advance dental restorations. It has been reported that irrespective of the color difference metric, the shade selection carried out by female operators showed greater success compared to males.12 This is probably due to the fact that colour vision anomaly is more prevalent in male than female which may affect shade selection.