HEALTHCARE FINANCING FOR ANTENATAL CARE AND DELIVERY SERVICES IN A TERTIARY HEALTH FACILITY IN SOUTH-WEST NIGERIA

Authors

R.A. Abdus-salam1, 3, T. Mark2, A.D. Agboola3, and T. Babawarun4

Correspondents

Dr. R.A. Abdus-salam
Department of Obs. and Gynae.,
College of Medicine,
University of Ibadan/
University College Hospital,
Ibadan, Oyo state,
Nigeria
Email: deolaabdussalam@gmail.com
raabdussalam@comui.edu.ng

Affiliation of Authors

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.
University College Hospital, Ibadan Oyo state, Nigeria.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo state, Nigeria.
Centre for Population and Reproductive Health, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo, Nigeria.

ABSTRACT

Background: Universal health coverage and healthcare financing for maternal health services are essential for quality care, prevention of complication and a reduction in maternal morbidity and mortality.

Objective:To evaluate the modes of healthcare financing for antenatal and delivery care among pregnant women in a tertiary health facility in South- West Nigeria.

Methods: This is a four-year retrospective review of maternal healthcare financing models adopted by pregnant/postpartum women at the antenatal clinic and labour/delivery unit. Data for health financing in antenatal booking clinic for a four-year period from 2016-2019 and labour & delivery for a two- year period from 2018 and 2019 were reviewed. The information collected were – number of women that paid out-of-pocket for services, number of women that paid for services using health insurance and other means of payment during the period. Data were analysed using SPSS version 23.

Result: A total of 7,129 women accessed antenatal care services during the period under review. About 58.9% of the women paid for antenatal care services out-of-pocket, 36.6% were covered under the health insurance (social and private health insurance). A total of 2,881 women accessed delivery services at the health facility. About 66.4% of the women paid out-of-pocket for both caesarean section and vaginal delivery. Prepaid health insurance was used by about 31% of the women.

Conclusion:Health insurance has been available for over a decade; however prepaid healthcare financing model remains less popular. Out-of-pocket payment constitutes the predominant mode of healthcare financing for maternal healthcare among pregnant women at the tertiary health facility. The out-of-pocket payment exposes the pregnant women and her family to financial burden and catastrophic spending especially in obstetric emergency.

Keywords: Healthcare financing, Out-of-pocket payment, Antenatal care, Health facility-based delivery

Scroll to Top